%20-%20C.png)
Payment Data Mapping Guide
Structured Field Reference Across SWIFT & ISO 20022 Message Formats
This guide explains how key elements required under the FATF Travel Rule (Recommendation 16) are mapped across different payment message types (SWIFT MT103, MT202 COV, and ISO 20022 pacs.008). It includes:
Where required data elements appear in each message type
Whether the fields are mandatory or optional
Format differences across message types
Context relevant to regulatory compliance
Required WTR Data Elements
These are the core data points PSPs and VASPs must include to comply with the UK wire transfer regulations:
Element | Description |
Payer Name | Name of sender |
Payer Account | Unique account number or wallet address |
Payer Address (or National ID, Customer ID, DOB/Place of Birth) | At least one is required |
Payee Name | Name of receiver |
Payee Account | Unique account number or wallet address |
Payee PSP | Destination bank/crypto service provider |
Transaction Reference | UETR, payment ID, or purpose of payment |
SWIFT MT103 Single Customer Credit Transfer
The MT103 is a single customer credit transfer message used for cross-border payments.
WTR Data Element | MT103 Field | Format | Notes |
Payer Name | :50K: (or :50F:) | Structured/unstructured | :50F: preferred for structured format |
Payer Account | :50K: | Unstructured | IBAN if available |
Payer Address / ID | :50K: | Unstructured | Full address or ID data in :50K: block |
Payee Name | :59: (or :59F:) | Structured/unstructured | Use :59F: for structured payee information |
Payee Account | :59: | Unstructured | IBAN/account number |
Payee Financial Institution | :57A: | BIC | Can be intermediary or direct receiving bank |
Transaction Reference | :20: / :21: / :23B: | Alphanumeric | :20: often holds UETR |
SWIFT MT202COV
Used for institution-to-institution payments linked to MT103 messages.
MT202 COV itself does not carry payer or payee data.
This information is instead embedded in the accompanying MT103 message.
WTR Element | MT202 COV Field | Notes |
Originator & Beneficiary | Not in MT202 COV | Must be retrieved from the related MT103 |
ISO 20022 pacs.008 Cross-Border or Domestic Credit Transfer
A modern XML-based message format that supports rich structured data equivalent to an MT103.
WTR Data Element | ISO 20022 Field | Notes |
Payer Name | <Dbtr><Nm> | Full name of payer |
Payer Account | <DbtrAcct><Id><IBAN> | IBAN or other account ID |
Payer Address | <Dbtr><PstlAdr> | Postal address, can be structured |
Payee Name | <Cdtr><Nm> | Full name pof payee |
Payee Account | <CdtrAcct><Id><IBAN> | IBAN or other account ID |
Payee Financial Institution | <CdtrAgt><FinInstnId><BICFI> | BIC of payee bank or VASP |
Intermediary FI | <IntrmyAgt1><FinInstnId><BICFI> | Optional intermediary BIC |
Transaction Reference | <TxId> or <InstrId> or <EndToEndId> | Use based on context and system implementation |
Advantages of ISO 20022
ISO 20022 offers several key advantages that make it particularly well-suited to modern financial messaging and regulatory compliance, especially in the context of the WTR and the FATF Travel Rule:
Structured Data Fields
ISO 20022 supports fully structured data formats for critical fields such as names, addresses, and account information. This enhances data consistency, reduces ambiguity, and enables automated processing by compliance and screening systems.
UTF-8 Encoding
By supporting UTF-8 character encoding, ISO 20022 accommodates a wide range of international alphabets and special characters. This ensures that names and address information can be accurately represented across different jurisdictions and languages, which is crucial for global financial institutions.
Compliance-Oriented Design
ISO 20022 was built with regulatory expectations in mind. Its structured format and rich data model make it ideal for transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, and compliance with requirements such as the FATF Recommendation 16 (Travel Rule). It enables better data quality and transparency, facilitating more effective supervision and enforcement.
Summary: Message Format Comparison
Feature | MT103 | MT202 COV | ISO 20022 (pacs.008) |
Payer/Payee Info | Directly present | Not in message body | Fully structured |
Support for Structured Data | Limited | None | Full support |
Travel Rule Compliance | Manual validation | Must rely on MT103 | Natively compliant |
Encoding | Latin-1 | Latin-1 | UTF-8 |